Impact & Transparency Dashboard
Statistics on our fact-checking work and impact
This dashboard shows our work transparently. We track not just the number of analyses, but also patterns in misinformation, which claims are most disputed, and how our work is used.
Overall Statistics
Claims Analyzed
TRUE
PARTIALLY TRUE
FALSE/MISLEADING
Analyses by Tradition
Buddhism
28
analyses completed
Christianity
31
analyses completed
Islam
22
analyses completed
Hinduism
18
analyses completed
Other Traditions
26
analyses completed
Most Common Claim Types
Misquoted Teachings
38%Famous quotes wrongly attributed or misquoted
Doctrinal Claims
28%"This tradition teaches..." claims
Historical Claims
20%Facts about historical events or figures
Practice Claims
14%What practitioners do or are required to do
Where Claims Come From
Social Media (TikTok, Twitter, Instagram)
42%Viral Reddit/WhatsApp posts
24%News articles & headlines
18%User submissions
12%Books & podcasts
4%Corrections & Updates
Corrections Made: 3 (showing we catch our own errors)
All corrected within 48 hours and logged transparently
Updates for New Evidence: 7
Analyses updated when new scholarship becomes available
Correction Rate: 2.4%
Very low error rate shows quality control systems work
Impact & Reach
Monthly Visitors
45K+
People checking our analyses
Shares & Citations
3.2K+
Times our analyses shared
Academic Citations
12+
In scholarly papers
Media Coverage
8+
Articles citing our work